Functional Outcomes of Patellar Tendon Bearing Brace in the Management of Tibial Shaft Fractures
PDF

Keywords

Patellar tendon bearing brace; Tibial shaft fracture; Functional outcome; Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (RUST); Knee range of motion; Non-operative treatment

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the functional and radiological effectiveness of PTB bracing in closed tibial shaft fractures at National Orthopedic and General Hospital, Bahawalpur.

Study design: It was a Single group Pretest-posttest experimental study.

Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at National Orthopedic and general hospital of Bahawalpur from February to July 2025.

Material and Methods: In this experimental study, 30 participants with closed, minimally displaced injuries of the tibial shaft followed by PTB brace were recruited by using convenience sampling technique.  Data was collected by measuring ROM at knee joint and fracture healing with the use of Radiographic Union Scale of Tibial Fractures (RUST). Data was analyzed by using SPSS. Paired t test was used to measure the changes between pre and post-intervention.

Results: Among the participants, the highest percentage belonged to the 25–35-year age group (53.3%), while road traffic accidents accounted for 43.3% of all tibial shaft fracture cases. The mean knee flexion showed a significant improvement from a baseline of 99.33 ± 14.60° to 106.73 ± 11.80° after one month (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean RUST score increased significantly from 1.77 ± 0.62 to 3.17 ± 0.62 (p < 0.001)

Conclusion: When bracing is applied, PTB achieves a significant increase in functional mobility as well as faster healing of fractures in stable tibial shaft fractures. It also offers an alternative option to surgical management.

https://doi.org/10.37939/jnah.v3i04.186
PDF

References

‎1.‎Tommasini S. The structural importance of the tibia in lower ‎limb function. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005; 87(11):2334-41.‎

‎2.‎Fukui N, Abe M, Nagura T. Biomechanical role of the tibia in ‎weight-bearing and joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. ‎‎2016; 34(6):298-310.‎

‎3.‎Kumar R, Sadiq M. High-energy tibial fractures: causes and ‎management approaches. Int J Orthop Trauma. 2025; ‎‎39(1):88-102.‎

‎4.‎Behrens F, Searls K, Haubold H. Stress fractures: causes and ‎management in athletes and military personnel. Sports Med J. ‎‎2013; 42(4):302-15.‎

‎5.‎Orthobullets, Aetna. Surgical and non-surgical interventions ‎for tibial fractures. Orthop Surg Rev. 2025; 51(1):67-80.‎

‎6.‎Ahmad M, Kamil S, Khan MA, Iqbal M. Effectiveness of ‎Patellar Tendon-Bearing (PTB) brace in tibial fracture ‎management. J Orthop Res. 1989; 7(3):112-8.‎

‎7.‎Chamani V, Bahramizahed M, Khosravi M, Biglarian A, ‎Ghorbani Amjad G, Mousavi SME, et al. Design and ‎evaluation of a patellar tendon-bearing brace with off-loading ‎mechanism on tibia. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024; 14(4):407-14.‎

‎8.‎Sarmiento A, Latta LL. Functional fracture bracing. Springer ‎Science & Business Media; 2006.‎

‎9.‎Mallik M, Maharaj RC, Rout PK, Nanda DP, Rout P. ‎Functional cast bracing in selected cases of tibial shaft fracture ‎in the population of Odisha: a prospective study. J Evid Based ‎Med Healthc. 2021; 8(9):462-7.‎

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Nursing and Allied Health