Diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Ultrasound in detection of choledocholithiasis taking ERCP as gold standard

Abstract

Objective: To  examine and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in establishing a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, and to compare the findings with the gold standard, ERCP.

 

Study design: It is a prospective study design

 

Place and duration of study: This four month study  was carried out in Jahangir SON-X Diagnostic Center, Rawalpindi.

 

Material and Methods: 200 patients suffering from symptoms with suspicion of choledocholithiasis were referred for ERCP. All the patients went through ultrasound and MRCP examinations and then the diagnosis for choledocholithiasis through these modalities was compared with the results of ERCP.

Results: Keeping ERCP as gold standard in choledocholithiasis diagnosis, Ultrasound showed a diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 49%, 43% and 100%, respectively. MRCP depicted diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 99%, 99% and 94%, respectively. One false-positive and one false-negative findings have been identified by the MRCP results.

Conclusion: The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is accurately done by MRCP, showing higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy than Ultrasound. Ultrasound shows higher specificity than MRCP.

 

Keywords: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Intra-Operative Cholangiography (IOC), Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC).

 

PDF

References

Sebghatollahi V, Parsa M, Minakari M, Azadbakht S. A clinician's guide to gallstones and common bile duct (CBD): A study protocol for a systematic review and evidence‐based recommendations. Health Science Reports. 2023 Sep;6(9):e1555.

Cianci P, Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021 Jul 7;27(28):4536.

Nadaf A. MR Cholangio-Pancreaticography as a Tool for Evaluation of Patients with Pancreaticobiliary Diseases (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).

Pan L, Chen M, Ji L, Zheng L, Yan P, Fang J, Zhang B, Cai X. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Annals of surgery. 2018 Aug 1;268(2):247-53.

Mandelia A, Gupta AK, Verma DK, Sharma S. The value of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013 Sep;7(9):1941.

Isram J, Haider E, Khan RS, Hafeez M, e Hinna R, Baig I, Shahid A, Chaudhry M, e Hina R. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison With Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of the Etiology of Obstructive Jaundice. Cureus. 2023 Feb 1;15(2).

Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci T, Chuttani R, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:589–597.

Laing FC, Jeffrey Jr. RB, et al. Choledocholithiasis and cystic duct obstruction: difficult ultrasonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1983;146:475–479

Mahadevan V. Anatomy of the gallbladder and bile ducts. Surgery (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;38(8):432-6.

Wilkins T, Agabin E, Varghese J, Talukder A. Gallbladder dysfunction: cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, and biliary dyskinesia. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2017 Dec 1;44(4):575-97.

van Dijk AH, de Reuver PR, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven KJ, Harrison EM, Wigmore SJ, Hugh TJ, Boermeester MA. Assessment of available evidence in the management of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a systematic review of international guidelines. Hpb. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):297-309.

Gad EH, Zakaria H, Kamel Y, Alsebaey A, Zakareya T, Abbasy M, Mohamed A, Nada A, Abdelsamee MA, Housseni M. Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study. Annals of medicine and surgery. 2019 Jul 1;43:52-63.

Varghese J, Liddell R, Farrell M, Murray F, Osborne DH, Lee MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clinical Radiology 2000;55(1):25-35.

Chen W, Mo JJ, Lin L, Li CQ, Zhang JF. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2015 Mar 3;21(11):3351.

Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WK, Ryder SD, Beckingham IJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2003 Jul 1;15(7):809-13.

Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg HR. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 1986 Dec;3(6):823-33.

Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB, Pullos TG, Wong HN, Hickman DM, Belber J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The American Journal of Surgery. 1982 Jul 1;144(1):109-14.

de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, Couzigou P, Silvain C. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 1999 Jan 1;49(1):26-31.

Zahur Z, Jielani A, Fatima T, Ahmad A. Transabdominal ultrasound: a potentially accurate and useful tool for detection of choledocholithiasis. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2019 Nov 1;31(4):572-5.

Javaid A, Mahmood R, Ullah H, Shafiq M, Dildar N, Abbas G. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Detection of Choledocholith, taking Post-Operative findings as the Gold Standard. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2023 Apr 17;73(2):394-97.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Mahnoor Tariq, Ayesha Imtiaz , Sana Shahzadi, Sumiya Abid, Areeba Ikram