Exploring the Role Preparedness for Principalship’s and related Challenges in Nursing Academia
PDF

Keywords

Nursing
Institute
College
Principal
Role preparedness
Challenges

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the preparedness of principals and vice principals in nursing institutions.
Place and duration of study: This study was conducted at nursing colleges in Islamabad and Rawalpindi that offer undergraduate BSN programs, including both public and private institutions. This study was conducted from March to September 2023.
Material and Methods: An exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative study design was used. Participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview guide.Content analysis was performed. The study was approved by the ethics and research board.
Results: Twelve interviews were conducted. Nine out of twelve participants were female and three were male. Two were vice principals, and the rest were principals. The analysis of the data brought the findings into five main categories and twenty subcategories. The categories included role preparedness for principalship, challenges related to role preparedness, participants, and recommendations. The subcategories followed each category.
Conclusion: Principals and vice principals performed academic planning and management, capacity building, quality assurance, and program excellence. A few challenges were constraints in planning budgets, financial management, operational hindrances, and resource limitations due to a lack of educational management knowledge and experience.
Keywords: Nursing, Institute/College, Principal, Role Preparedness, Challenges, MSN

 

https://doi.org/10.37939/jnah.v3i03.148
PDF

References

Oplatka I. The principalship in developing countries: context, characteristics and reality. Comp Educ [Internet]. 2004 Aug 1;40(3):427–448. Available https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000274872

Morin K. Nursing education: The past, present and future. J Heal Spec. 2014;2(4):136.

Chari SN. Comparing the effectiveness of masters-prepared and nonmasters-prepared nurse leaders. Diss Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2018;78(9-B(E)).

Gerard SO, Kazer MW, Babington L, Quell TT. Past, present, and future trends of master’s education in nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30(4):326–332.

Hickman LD, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Rao A, Newton PJ, Jackson D, et al. Improving evidence based practice in

postgraduate nursing programs: A systematic review: Bridging the evidence practice gap (BRIDGE project). Nurse

Educ Today. 2018;63:69–75.

Dobratz MC, Primomo J, Delo D. A Comparative Analysis of Master of Nursing Students’ Scholarly Inquiry. J Prof Nurs. 2012;28(6):369–376.

Cotterill-Walker SM. Where is the evidence that master’s level nursing education makes a difference to patient care? A literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(1):57–64.

Jackson M, Marchi N. Graduate-entry education for nonnurses: Preparation, pathways, and progress. Nurs Educ

Perspect. 2020;41(1):30–32.

Cassum S., Gul R. Creating enabling environment for student engagement: faculty practices of critical thinking. Int J High Educ. 2017;6(1):101–111.

Heinen M, van Oostveen C, Peters J, Vermeulen H, Huis A. An integrative review of leadership competencies and

attributes in advanced nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(11):2378–2392.

Drennan J. Masters in nursing degrees: An evaluation of management and leadership outcomes using a retrospective pre-test design. J Nurs Manag. 2012;20(1):102–112.

Massimi A, Marzuillo C, Di Muzio M, Vacchio MR, D’Andrea E, Villari P, et al. Are knowledge and skills

acquired during the Master Degree in Nursing actually put into practice? A pilot study in Italy. Epidemiol Biostat Public Heal. 2016;13(1): 1-4.

Massimi A, Marzuillo C, Di Muzio M, Vacchio MR, D’Andrea E, Villari P, et al. Quality and relevance of master

degree education for the professional development of nurses and midwives. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;53(April):5460.

Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England; 2018. 393–395 p.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017. 313–314 p.

Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.

Gray JR, Grove SK, Sutherland S. Burns and grove’s the practice of nursing research-E-book: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Progr Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84.

Markowitz M, John S, College F. The Academic Nurse Leader ’ s Role in Supporting Novice Nurse Educator Transition : A Grounded Theory Study How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited you ? The Academic Nurse Leader ’ s Role in Supporting Novice Nurse Educator. 2018;

Clark L, Casey D, Morris S. The value of Master's degrees for registered nurses. British Journal of Nursing. 2015;24(6):328334.

Zwanikken PA, Dieleman M, Samaranayake D, Akwataghibe N, Scherpbier A. A systematic review of outcome and impact of Master’s in health and health care. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1):1–11.

Galdames-Calderón M. Distributed Leadership: School Principals’ Practices to Promote Teachers’ Professional

Development for School Improvement. Educ Sci. 2023;13(7):715. Access Economics. (2016). Dementia in the

Asia Pacific Region: The epidemic is here. Canberra, Australia: Alzheimer’s Australia.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Nursing and Allied Health