Keywords
Abstract
Objective: An analysis of ultrasound and computed tomography focusing on their diagnostic accuracy in patients with urolithiasis
Study design: It was a descriptive cross sectional study.
Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at Sonex Diagnostic Centre, in Rawalpindi, from April to September 2024.
Material and Methods: A total of 113 patients were studied for the research purpose. Detailed examinations were performed including USG and CT.
Results: The results of study showed that out of 113 patients, 78 (69.02%) patients were male and 35(30.97%) were female. Out of total 113 patients, those in the age group 31-40 years were more likely diagnosed with disease. In this study, the positive and negative results obtained from ultrasound diagnostics were evaluated across different anatomical locations (N/L, V/L, U/L, PUJ, and VUJ). To understand the effectiveness of ultrasound, the positive ultrasound results were compared to CT scan findings, which were considered the reference standard. Ultrasound detected 48 positive cases of nephrolithiasis and missed 17 cases (negative on ultrasound but potentially positive on CT). The nephrolithiasis site had the highest number of positive findings. For V/L (Vesicle Lithiasis), 5 cases were identified as positive, with only 1 false negative. For U/L (Ureterolithiasis), ultrasound detected 15 positive cases, while 11 cases were missed. For VUJ (Vesicoureteric Junction), 6 positive cases were detected, with no negatives recorded. Out of 113 patients, 9 patients were negative on both USG and CT, while 1 patient was suspected of having ureterolithiasis on USG but was not confirmed to have a stone on CT.
Conclusion: The ultrasound’s performance varies significantly across different anatomical regions, indicating that it may be more effective for certain locations and less reliable for others. Overall, ultrasound shows high sensitivity for detecting positive cases in the N/L and VUJ regions. It may not always provide the necessary accuracy for diagnosing all types of urinary tract stones, particularly in areas like the PUJ and U/L. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT are greater than US technique. Therefore, a combined approach using CT scanning as the reference standard may improve the diagnostic accuracy, especially for patients with symptoms or risk factors for stones in regions where ultrasound sensitivity is limited. This highlights the importance of using ultrasound in conjunction with other imaging modalities to ensure a thorough and accurate assessment of urological conditions.
References
Sandhu MS, Gulati A, Saritha J, Nayak B. Urolithiasis: Comparison of diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis and ultrasound. Which one to choose and when?. European Journal of Radiology. 2018 Aug 1;105:25-31.
Scales Jr CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. European urology. 2012 Jul 1;62(1):160-5.
Fontenelle LF, Sarti TD. Kidney stones: treatment and prevention. American family physician. 2019 Apr 15; 99(8):490-6.
Gottlieb M, Long B, Koyfman A. The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED: A review of the literature. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2018 Apr 1;36(4):699-706.
Vijayakumar M, Ganpule A, Singh A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Review of techniques for ultrasonic determination of kidney stone size. Research and reports in urology. 2018 Aug 10:57-61.
Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nature Reviews Urology. 2016 Nov;13(11):654-62.
Ganesan V, De S, Greene D, Torricelli FC, Monga M. Accuracy of ultrasonography for renal stone detection and size determination: is it good enough for management decisions?. BJU international. 2017 Mar;119(3):464-9.
Dhar M, Denstedt JD. Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2009 Jan 1;16(1):39-47.
Andrabi Y, Patino M, Das CJ, Eisner B, Sahani DV, Kambadakone A. Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis. Indian Journal of Urology. 2015 Jul 1;31(3):185-93.
Khalid T, Farooq SM, Ali H, Khan A, Mubashir M, Afzal Z, Laraib E, Naeem F, Ashraf S. Diagnostic Accuracy Of Ultrasound For The Diagnosis Of Ureteric Stone In Adults Taking Computed Tomography As Gold Standard. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. 2023 Jul 23:598-602.
Jaiswal P, Shrestha S, Dwa Y, Maharjan D, Sherpa NT. CT KUB evaluation of suspected urolithiasis. Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2022 Jun 17;9(1):58-64.
Javed M. Diagnostic accuracy of trans-abdominal ultrasonography in urolithiasis, keeping CT KUB as gold standard. Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College. 2018 Nov 18;7(3):204-7.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Nursing and Allied Health